An empty feeling after the death of bin Laden

Violent Islamic fundamentalism will not disappear simply because bin Laden has been killed.

Sponsorship

by

Ted Van Dyk

Violent Islamic fundamentalism will not disappear simply because bin Laden has been killed.

The killing Sunday (May  1) in Pakistan of Osama bin Laden, by an American  special-operations team, was rejoiced in many places. Yet, in the end,  it seemed empty.

Bin Laden remained at his death the symbolic leader of the al-Qaida  movement, but day-to-day control of al-Qaida operations had long since  passed to lieutenants in a number of countries. And it had taken  American and Western intelligence and military services nearly a decade  since 9/11, and 20 years since al-Qaida commenced attacks on Western  targets, to bring him to justice.

A few initial observations:

• Pakistani intelligence services had to have known bin Laden's  whereabouts within their country. The compound where he was killed included by far the largest home in the town, 40 miles from the Pak  capital of Islamabad, and it was guarded and fortified. It is quite  possible, in fact, that the intelligence services provided the place to  him. Discount reports of U.S.-Pak cooperation in the operation.

• The sad fact remains that bin Laden gained power, in part, through American misjudgments. U.S. Rep. Charlie Wilson of Texas became enamored during the 1980s with Islamic fundamentalist resistance  to the Soviet occupation of  Afghanistan; he conspired, outside normal  channels, to bring supplies and weapons to these forces, in which bin  Laden was prominent. They later used them to maintain an al-Qaida base in Afghanistan and install a Taliban regime  which would protect them.  The Clinton and Bush administrations missed  numerous pre-9/11 opportunities to take out bin Laden and the al-Qaida  camps and leadership.

• Al-Qaida is a global movement, but fundamentalist movements in many Islamic countries, such as the Taliban in Afghanistan, will continue. In a number of Middle Eastern countries, presently in  turmoil, fundamentalists are attempting to grab a piece of power as  long-reigning oligarchic regimes are toppling or shaky. The Muslim  Brotherhood has reemerged in Egypt; al-Qaida types are present, for  instance, among Libyan and Yemeni rebel movements. As old regimes give  way, there is no certainty that Western-style reformers will ultimately  succeed them.

• Stalinism receded after Stalin; Hitlerism of course was forcibly  eradicated after Hitler. But violent Islamic fundamentalism will not disappear simply because bin Laden has been killed. His visage no  doubt will appear for many years on fundamentalist posters and banners,  just as Lenin's did until the final, internal collapse of communism in  the old Soviet Union.

In the meantime, the greatest threat to our long-term national security is being addressed today (May 2) in Washington, D.C., where White House and Congressional representatives resume talks regarding lifting of the federal debt ceiling — and the reduction of our $14-trillion-plus national debt.

Ted Van Dyk

By Ted Van Dyk

Ted Van Dyk has been active in national policy and politics since 1961, serving in the White House and State Department and as policy director of several Democratic presidential campaigns. He is auth