Politics

Best of 2011: James Corner's waterfront plans: Get the editing pencil

The success of some New York public spaces such as the High Line and Bryant Park may be leading the architect for Seattle's proposed Waterfront Park to crowd and over-program a space that cries out for serenity and introspection.

Best of 2011: James Corner's waterfront plans: Get the editing pencil
Advertisement

by

Mark Hinshaw

The success of some New York public spaces such as the High Line and  Bryant Park may be leading the architect for Seattle's proposed  Waterfront Park to crowd and over-program a space that cries out for  serenity and introspection.

Editor's Note: In the run-up to the new year, Crosscut will be sharing ten days of its best stories from 2011, each with a different theme. Today's theme: Public Spaces.

A couple of weeks ago, landscape architect James  Corner returned to Seattle to give us another look at what his team of  designers and artists were contemplating for our central waterfront.  Essentially, he zeroed in on a handful of places with more refined ideas  of what they might be. As always, Corner was articulate, affable,  erudite, and easy to listen to. Considerably less so was the subsequent  presentation by artist Mark Dion, which was essentially extolling the  qualifications of the “all-star” arts team and using the word, “right” a  lot at the end of sentences. But we did learn a bit more.

A confession is in order here. I viewed to the presentations online,  as I was not in town during the presentation. More precisely, I was in  New York, in part taking in some of the public spaces that have served  as inspiration for the proposals being advanced here in Seattle.

While I listened to the presentation, which is viewable on line at waterfrontseattle.org,  I reflected upon my fresh experiences in the city which serves as  Corner’s base. His High Line project, which has received well-deserved  accolades, is an elegant and fascinating retrofit and repurposing of  what I recall from many years ago as an ugly, elevated railway  superstructure winding through a little visited part of the city.

Today, the High Line is a stunning attraction that symbolizes and  reflects the remarkable infusion of new energy in the surrounding  neighborhoods. In the Seattle proposals, one can clearly see a similar  flair for theatricality and layered urbanity. Attention to details on  the High Line is clearly evident  — paving, planting, and seating are  all deftly designed and crafted. No wonder the place is crowded with  couples and families all the time.

One thing that struck me immediately and stayed with  me was the element of street theatre firmly displayed throughout.  People watch people who are watching people. At times, it is hard to  tell if something has been staged, is random, or is merely people  behaving as they always do. Indeed, a group of performers recently  enacted short bits of human drama and comedy — only marginally more  unusual than one might regularly see on any street in New   York. When I  was there, a couple of immaculately dressed runners were repeating  short bursts of rapid sprinting as a film crew stood off to one side. Or  was it a crew? Maybe just curious bystanders?

The High Line is literally an elevated stage, and a rather crowed one  at that. Whether by intent or happy accident, the place is packed with  strollers, people pushing strollers, lovers, tourists, people of all  ages, folks sitting and sunning, schmoozing, sipping lattes or chomping  on pastries sold from a couple of food vendors. The presence of people  everywhere — moving, standing, sitting, sprawling — is part of the  allure. And so with Corner’s design for our Seattle downtown waterfront,  as seen in the many renderings packed with people.

Over the past five years, New York has been in the process of  re-allocating space along many of its major thoroughfares. Although the  creation of bicycle lanes has received the most attention (both positive  and negative) it is the conversion of travel lanes to pedestrian uses  that is absolutely stunning. This is particularly noticeable in  locations where different streets intersect at acute angles. What used  to be broad swaths of unused asphalt are now small but exquisite  park-like spaces that extend the sidewalk. Most are planted generously  and contain seating and lighting. Many are locations for street vendors  or artwork.

The most spectacular of these is Broadway in Times Square. Broadway generally meanders about, crossing other streets at sharp  angles. This created complex intersections with turning and twisting  cars, wild honking, scurrying taxis, trucks lurching about, all with  pedestrians attempting to cross. The resulting congestion and cacophony  were virtually the signature experience of the place; in other words,  unrelenting chaos.

Now, much of Broadway is narrowed or closed to traffic altogether.  People stroll about, sit at folding tables and chairs, dance, talk in  clumps, eat, act up, play instruments, and display all manner of human  activities in a broad promenade that encompasses many blocks. Many of  the visual depictions for the new Alaskan Way suggest a similar  ambience. People everywhere, sitting, standing, walking, running,  shopping, eating. Lots of people.

Another public space that seems to have served as inspiration is the  renovation of Bryant Park. For many years, this was a park that was  over-run by drug addicts and dealers and all manner of unsavory people.  Few people felt safe enough to venture into the interior during the day,  much less in the evening.  In the late 1980s the operations and  management were turned over to a non-profit organization, the Bryant  Park Corporation . They conducted a thorough renovation  and restored the great lawn, filling it with moveable metal chairs.  They also added some well-designed vending kiosks and restaurants at the  corner entrance points and installed a public restroom, the latter  quite gracious and elegant by any measure.

Since then, the park is as fine as any in Paris. With the Beaux-Arts  style main public library as a backdrop, the ambiance has been not  unlike the Luxembourg Gardens on Paris' Left Bank. It's a combination of  sweeping, classic formality and symmetry with a randomness created by  people making arrangements — sociable or solitary — with simple,  moveable chairs.

But on this recent visit, Bryant park was packed with glass and steel vending stalls — so many that its was barely  possible to see into the space from the street. For the winter season,  the lawn has been converted to a skating rink, which has become de rigueur in many downtowns. For the next two months, the holiday shopping  season, the park is a shopping center, jammed with people buying goods  and food. There is virtually no place to escape the swirling crush of  people as they careen about in this over-commercialized space.

Here is a city that offers perhaps the highest concentration of  one-of-kind shops and cafes located in all sorts of unique  neighborhoods. Yet, an otherwise splendid park somehow thinks it has to  offer even more shopping experiences. It's relentlessly about providing  things for people to do…and buy. I suspect the cost of maintenance and  security has demanded a degree of commercialization in order to pay for  it all.

One of the current themes in city planning is ensure that public  spaces are “programmed.” Indeed, Corner’s Seattle presentation gave that  theme a particular emphasis. Programming is certainly not a bad thing,  as many public spaces fall into disuse or misuse because of a lack of  activity around the perimeter. But it is possible to have too much of a  good thing as well.

Not all of life is about doing “active” things. Most people  appreciate places where they can have a quiet re-connection with nature  without proximity to crowds, performances, shopping, and eating.

That's why I was made uneasy by Corner's presentation. It seemed that  whatever segment he described, there were always shops, always an  amphitheatre, always events, always stuff to do. The effort to animate  and activate public spaces can be overdone. Indeed, one of the great  traditions of public spaces in this region is that one can be in a  relatively verdant and serene setting. It's not all about festivals,  shopping, and entertainment.

I found one image in the presentation particularly compelling. That was Pier 62 with two simple additions — a graphic painted on the  surface and yellow chairs spotted about facing the bay. Simple, light,  easy, low cost. No pools, no shops, no “pop up” street theatre. Yet  people were clearly enjoying the splendid setting of water, sun and  snow-capped mountains. Even in some recent waterfront esplanades  elsewhere in the world, such as the spectacular one in Barcelona, there  are quiet places to be alone.

One of the unique aspects of Seattle is that it has blended two  cultures that thrive on the concept of elegant restraint — Asian and  Scandinavian. This may be the only place on earth where two completely  unconnected cultures have advanced ideas of craft, artistry, and  introspective serenity, mixed with a deep regard for the past.

So here's some advice to all this New Yorkish frenzy: Corner's  current ideas would benefit from some serious editing. Sometimes the  best solution is nothing at all, or at least very little. Light touches.  Soft touches. Small touches. Fortunately Corner and company have shown  they are good at doing these.

Let’s tone the party down and gain a bit more simplicity. Less can be more.

This story has been updated since it first appeared to restore a word dropped from the description of James Corner's background.

Donation CTA
Mark Hinshaw

By Mark Hinshaw

Mark Hinshaw, FAIA, is an architect and urban planner. He was an architecture critic for The Seattle Times and is the author of many articles and books, including Citistate Seattle (1999).