New Washington law will exclude medical debt from credit reports

This article was originally published by the Washington State Standard.

Washingtonians’ medical debt will not be included in their credit reports, under a bill that Gov. Bob Ferguson signed into law earlier this week. 

Medical debt can create a spiraling effect and prevent people from getting approved for car or home loans or apartment rentals. Medical debt can also cause providers to deny services to patients with outstanding bills or dissuade people from seeking care. 

Senate Bill 5480, sponsored by Sen. Marcus Riccelli, D-Spokane, intends to mirror efforts at the federal level that have been thrown into question. It will prohibit collection agencies from reporting overdue medical debt to credit agencies. The bill will take effect on July 27. 

In January, the Biden administration finalized a similar federal rule before President Donald Trump took office. It was set to take effect in March, but it is currently on pause by the Trump administration and faces legal challenges. 

The new state law is intended to help people like Christopher Raymond, who was diagnosed with stage 2 Hodgkin lymphoma at age 16. 

To get the treatment Raymond needed to survive, his dad was forced to retire and cash out his pension, which amounted to $60,000. 

Originally from Everett, Raymond’s family moved to California so he could receive the treatment he needed, which lasted two years and required a stem cell transplant, which was not covered by his dad’s insurance. The move made him eligible for Medi-Cal, California’s Medicaid program, which covered his treatments. 

Despite the coverage, he and his family faced extreme hardships and had trouble paying for necessities such as food and utilities. 

“There was a point where it got really bad that I was eating those quarter chicken legs you would get from the grocery store and it would be my only meal I could have for the day,” Raymond said. 

Raymond is now 28 and has been cancer-free for 10 years, but says his family could’ve been pushed into extreme debt for his treatments, which cost upward of $6 million before accounting for insurance payments. 

“I shouldn’t be punished for having cancer,” Raymond said. 

His experience is shared by many who have undergone similar health issues. 

When this happens, people might stop or delay treatments because they can’t afford them or because their insurance companies don’t approve the care. People, at times, also lose everything they own to continue their treatments, or they end up dying of cancer. 

Roughly six in 10 Washington adults say they could not pay an unexpected $500 medical bill, and about 30% say they live in a household with medical debt, even with health insurance, according to a report done by the Northwest Health Law Advocates.

Audrey Miller García, government relations director at the American Cancer Society, explained that families can still have to pay debt they accrued from treatments if their child dies of cancer.

Even when someone survives cancer, they may still need treatment for the rest of their lives. These follow-up treatments are expensive, and depending on the insurance coverage a person has, the care can land them in thousands of dollars’ worth of debt. 

Raymond still gets billed.

“My lifelong care after cancer is always going to be met with more insurance bills,” he said. 

He says he’s been due for a CT scan for over six years, but is worried about going into debt because he cannot afford the scan even after his co-pay. 

“You shouldn’t be punished for having cancer, you should get through it and be able to not worry about having to live, because it’s not enough to just survive, you need to live too,” Raymond said.

The Washington State Standard originally published this story on April 22, 2025. Jacquelyn Jimenez Romero is a WSU Murrow News Fellow.

More Briefs

Canada’s Liberal Party holds onto power, Mark Carney remains PM

The American and Canadian flags fly above the Peace Arch at the US-Canada Border in Blaine, Washington.

The American and Canadian flags fly above the Peace Arch at the U.S./Canada Border in Blaine, Wash. (M. Scott Brauer/Cascade PBS)

Canada’s Liberal Party has retained power after Monday’s national election results, but it remains to be seen whether the party will have an outright majority in the House of Commons or need to build a minority government. 

The Liberals, led by Prime Minister Mark Carney, were a few seats away from an outright majority by Tuesday afternoon, but many seats across Canada were still very close as vote counts continued. 

Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, lost his seat in the House of Commons, as did New Democratic Party leader Jagmeet Singh.  

Carney has been the prime minister of Canada since March 9, two months after the longtime Prime Minister Justin Trudeau resigned. According to the CBC, Carney and the Liberals came from behind during the course of the 36-day campaign, speaking against U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs and threats to annex Canada as the 51st State. 

Join Cascade PBS & Daybreak Star Radio for a free film screening

Origins Community Event

Photo by Bert W. Huntoon, courtesy Whatcom Museum, Bellingham, Wash. Logo design by Jason LaClair. (Sienum)

Join Cascade PBS and Daybreak Star Radio for a free screening of three episodes of Origins: The Last Reefnetters, a five-part documentary series on the history and culture of reefnet fishing in the Salish Sea, followed by a community discussion with Cascade PBS and Daybreak Star Radio journalists. 

The event will be held on Sunday, May 4 at 3 p.m. at the Daybreak Star Indian Cultural Center, 5011 Bernie Whitebear Way in Discovery Park. It will be free and open to the public. RSVP here

The five-part docuseries follows the final 12 captains to hold a reefnet fishing license, of whom only one is an enrolled tribal member. The practice was developed by the Lummi Nation and other Northern Straits Salish tribes thousands of years ago, but following punitive legislation, environmental damage and devastation caused by a budding cannery industry, Indigenous reefnetters were all but removed from the practice. Filmmaker Samuel Wolfe examines the legal, spiritual and cultural subtext that intertwines the Salish Sea’s last reefnetters. 

Permits to purchase guns may soon be required in Washington

Guns hang on a wall

Guns for rent at the Bellevue Indoor Gun Range on Monday, Aug. 22, 2022. (Amanda Snyder/Cascade PBS)

Gun buyers may soon need a permit and safety training to purchase a firearm in Washington.

House Bill 1163 is one step away from becoming a law after passing the Legislature on Tuesday. It now awaits a signature from Gov. Bob Ferguson, who has pushed for gun safety laws in the past.

Under the proposed policy, which would go into effect May 2027, any resident wishing to purchase a gun would be required to first apply for a permit, then pay a fee and show documentation of having completed a safety training program within five years. The training must include live-fire shooting exercises and a demonstration of safely handling a firearm.

The proposal sparked tensions this session between gun safety advocates, who said the legislation would reduce the state’s suicide and homicide rates, and gun rights supporters, who said it would infringe on Second Amendment rights.

The bill passed the House and the Senate along party lines, with only Democrats supporting it.

Bill sponsor Rep. Liz Berry, D-Seattle, said permit-to-purchase programs save lives.

“They make sure guns don’t get into the hands of the wrong people, they make sure that guns aren’t diverted to black markets, and they prevent crime,” she said during a floor debate Tuesday.

But Rep. Jim Walsh, R-Aberdeen, disagreed, calling the bill an unconstitutional “scheme” to test gun owners at their own personal cost.

“It is no guarantee that one murder will be prevented, that one assault will be prevented, that one suicide will be prevented,” Walsh said.

The new system would require the Washington State Patrol to approve permits within 30 days of application, or within 60 days for applicants without valid state ID. The state could not issue a permit to anyone who has been prohibited from purchasing a firearm under state or federal law, awaiting a trial for a felony or with an outstanding warrant.

Law enforcement, members of the military, private investigators, security guards and tribal law officers would all be exempt from the training requirement.

Thirteen other states have laws requiring permits to purchase certain firearms.

The Legislature’s proposal has garnered support from Attorney General Nick Brown, who testified in favor of the policy in a Senate Committee hearing in March.

“Through background checks, training, and other safety steps, we can make meaningful use of the critical time between someone’s choice to purchase a firearm and when they obtain that weapon,” Brown said.

The permit-to-purchase proposal is the only gun safety bill that has made it through both chambers of the Legislature this session. Other policies were proposed to require owners to lock up their guns when in vehicles or homes, limit bulk purchases of guns and ammunition and restrict where gun owners can openly carry their weapons. But none made it through this session.

Jake Tapper, Amanda Knox & more: Ideas Festival lineup announced

The "Text Me Back" podcast takes the stage at the Cascade PBS Ideas Festival in 2024

Lindy West, Meagan Hatcher-Mays and Guy Branum on stage at the Cascade PBS Ideas Festival on May 4, 2024. (Christopher Nelson for Cascade PBS)

The Cascade PBS Ideas Festival returns May 31, with a lineup featuring Jake Tapper, Amanda Knox, and a slate of local and nationally recognized journalists, podcasters and lawmakers deconstructing the day’s most pressing issues. The full lineup of speakers was released today.

This year’s festival will include live podcast and television recordings from outlets like CNN, NPR and The Atlantic alongside a mix of community events in downtown Seattle. More information is available here.

Seattle democracy voucher renewal set for August ballot

A tall building

Seattle City Hall on Wednesday, Aug. 1, 2018. (Jovelle Tamayo for Cascade PBS)

Seattle voters will be asked in August if they want to continue paying for the city’s democracy voucher program — a first-of-its-kind public campaign-financing system that gives voters money to donate to political candidates. 

Seattle voters created the program in 2015, along with a 10-year property tax levy to fund it. The voucher program aims to make election financing more diverse and equitable by giving voters four $25 coupons they can give to city of Seattle candidates during elections. 

Ten years after it was created, city officials say the program has been a success. On Monday, the Seattle City Council voted unanimously to send a property tax levy renewal to the August ballot that would fund the program for another decade. 

If passed, the levy would cost the median homeowner about $13 a year and raise about $45 million over 10 years. The figure is about $15 million higher than the expiring levy to account for inflation and increased candidate participation in the program. 

City Council members praised the program across the board, with several saying they’d seen the positive impact firsthand during their own runs for office. 

“For me, this specifically meant that I didn’t need to take campaign donations that I felt might have implicit strings attached,” said Councilmember Dan Strauss. “This allowed me to be more independent, and it meant that I actively chose to knock on everyday Seattleites’ doors rather than spending time on the phone, calling political donors.” 

Many Councilmembers said the program is especially important in light of threats to democracy at the national level and the growing influence of wealth in politics. 

“Our democracy is at risk,” said Councilmember Alexis Mercedes Rinck. “We must take every step here in Seattle to protect it, because in a healthy democracy, billionaires can’t buy elections.” 

Most democracy vouchers go unused. A study by researchers at Stony Brook and Georgetown University found that participation among the voting-age population declined from 7.59% in the 2021 election to 4.72% in 2023. 

City Council member Cathy Moore noted that there remains a need to educate people about the program, particularly in communities where English is not the primary language. 

Candidates in the races for Seattle mayor, city attorney and three Council seats are eligible for democracy vouchers this year.

Note: This story was updated on 4/22/25 to correct the difference between the previous property tax levy and the new proposal. 

Washington lawmakers remember State Senator Bill Ramos

Bill Ramos leans to talk to Alex Ramel on the House chamber floor

Rep. Bill Ramos, D-Issaquah, left, talks with Rep. Alex Ramel, D-Bellingham, on the first day of the legislative session at the Washington state Capitol in January 2024. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson)

The wings off the Senate floor were packed Monday, April 21, as Washington lawmakers and staff remembered Sen. Bill Ramos, D-Issaquah, who died suddenly over the weekend.

In a somber moment, those who had worked with Ramos exchanged hugs, tissues, tears and memories. A large portrait of Ramos surrounded by fresh flowers stood near the front of the chamber, where colleagues honored their colleague with a moment of silence.

Ramos died Saturday evening while trail-running with his dog, Sadie, after a day of work in Olympia, wrote his wife, King County Councilmember Sarah Perry, in a statement on Facebook. He was 69.

Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, said Ramos’ death was “a devastating loss for our caucus and for our state.”

“Bill was one of the most kind and joyful people I’ve had the pleasure to work with,” Pedersen said in a statement. “He never let even the most serious matters get too serious. He made you like him the moment you met him.”

Ramos was first elected to represent the Fifth Legislative District in the House of Representatives in 2018 and was recently elected to the state Senate in November. He previously served on the Issaquah City Council.

At a morning bill signing, Gov. Bob Ferguson acknowledged the “shocking loss” of Ramos over the weekend. Ferguson signed a bill that Ramos had worked on, which exempted some Department of Corrections employees from coalition bargaining requirements.

Ferguson said he would send one of the pens used to sign the law to Perry, Ramos’s wife.

“He was a wonderful public servant,” Ferguson said. “More importantly, he was a likeable guy, a kind guy, who was always a joy to be around. We’ll be thinking about him today and for a long time to come.”

Ramos’ death came with just one week left in the Legislature’s scheduled session. Like the rest of the Senate, he had been working on Saturday.

Speaking on a resolution to honor former Secretary of State Ralph Munro, who died last month, Sen. Keith Wagoner, R-Sedro-Woolley, noted Monday morning that he was standing in front of Ramos’ desk, where Ramos had been just two days before.

“I hope you’ll forgive me if I’m a little rattled,” Wagoner said.

Wagoner went on to reminisce about Munro with comments that he said were “even more poignant today.”

“All of us, at some point, will be memorialized in a similar manner, and none of us know the time or the date of that happening,” he said.

A bill that aims to address housing supply and affordability in Washington by lowering parking requirements for new residential and commercial development passed through the state Legislature and will head to the governor’s desk to be signed into law. 

Senate Bill 5184, called the Parking Reform and Modernization Act, would restrict how much parking cities and counties are allowed to require for new development. 

If signed into law, cities with 30,000 or more residents would be prohibited from requiring more than 0.5 parking spaces per new multifamily unit, or more than one parking space per single family home. Cities would be prohibited from requiring any parking for residences under 1,200 square feet, commercial spaces under 3,000 square feet, senior housing, child care facilities or housing classified as affordable. 

The law would also limit restrictions on commercial development to no more than two parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. 

In all cases, developers could still choose to provide more parking if they want to. 

The Sightline Institute, a nonprofit research and policy group, celebrated the passage of the bill in a blog post last week as “one of the strongest parking reform packages attempted anywhere in the United States.” 

For decades, many Washington cities have made it illegal to build housing without providing at least one parking space per unit. But parking reform advocates argue that those requirements prioritize cars over people and add unnecessary costs that hinder new housing development. 

“These rules are totally arbitrary,” said Catie Gould, a researcher with Sightline, in an interview last month. “Most cities don’t remember where these ratios came from. They were adopted really quickly in the 1950s and ’60s.” 

Some cities, like Mercer Island, require a “minimum ratio of two parking spaces for each unit” in apartment complexes. Gould argues that doesn’t make sense because nearly 60% of renter households in Washington have just one car or none at all. When developers are forced to build parking spaces that people don’t need, the costs often get passed on to the tenant, Gould said. 

“They’re overbuilding for renters and they’re adding these unnecessary costs that people don’t need,” Gould said. “If we really want to build more housing and open up opportunities for new housing, excessive parking mandates have got to go.” 

The bill was introduced by Sen. Jessica Bateman, D-Olympia. It received pushback from some city officials, who argued that local governments are best suited to make zoning decisions, and that the law would erode local control. 

At a hearing last month, Kennewick Councilmember Jim Millbauer urged lawmakers to “allow cities to develop more locally tailored programs.” 

“Kennewick does not have a transit system that is robust enough to provide efficient service throughout the community,” Millbauer said. “We also live in a rural area, which means more of our residents use a vehicle to get to work or school. Today we are, and for the foreseeable future will continue to be, an auto-centric community.” 

Amendments in the House Local Government Committee scaled back the scope of the law. After passing the Senate with an added exemption for cities with under 20,000 residents, the bill was further narrowed in the House to exempt cities with fewer than 30,000 people. That would allow cities like Mercer Island (pop. 24,742) to continue setting their own parking ratios. The House also added a three-year phase-in period for cities with 30,000 to 50,000 residents and an 18-month phase-in for cities with 50,000 or more residents. 

Gould said she was disappointed by the exemptions for smaller cities. “These rules cause problems in communities of all sizes around the state,” she said. “Nobody has to stop driving for this reform to make sense, we’re trying to provide more opportunities and more choices for people.” 

In a Friday post on Bluesky, Bateman celebrated the bill advancing to the governor’s desk. “Two years ago, parking reform of this magnitude would not have been possible,” Bateman wrote. “Pro-housing advocates have changed the narrative and demanded action.” 

A handful of Washington cities have fully scrapped parking mandates in recent years. Spokane was the first major city to do so — eliminating parking requirements near transit stops in 2023, and then citywide in 2024. 

So far, Spokane’s reforms haven’t spurred dramatic change. Developers are still choosing to provide parking “in almost all cases,” said Spokane Councilmember Zack Zappone while testifying in favor of the statewide bill last month.

“In the majority of cases, they’re still providing at least one space per unit,” Zappone said. “In a few cases, they’re providing a ratio below the one-to-one. In extremely rare cases, they’re not doing any on-site parking at all.”

WA Supreme Court strikes down Spokane camping ban initiative

Camp Hope in 2023

Camp Hope, which used to house up to hundreds of unhoused people in its 18 months of operation in 2022 and 2023, prompted a local initiative banning camping 1,000 feet from schools, parks and day care centers. The Washington Supreme Court ruled that the measure, which voters passed overwhelmingly in 2023, was beyond the scope of what is allowed with local initiative power. (Young Kwak for Cascade PBS)

The Washington Supreme Court on Thursday nullified a 2023 Spokane ballot initiative that expanded the city’s camping ban, reversing decisions from trial and appeal courts.

The majority for Jewels Helping Hands and Ben Stuckart v. Brian Hansen, et al., in an opinion written by Justice Gordon McCloud, stated that Proposition 1 was beyond the scope allowed by local initiative power because it “administer[ed] the details” of the city’s existing anti-camping policy rather than create a new law or policy.

“I hope this decision paves the way for less discrimination against our homeless neighbors,” said Julie Garcia, founder and executive director of Jewels Helping Hands, one of the plaintiffs in the case who sought to block the initiative.

The initiative, sponsored by Spokane resident Brian Hansen, prohibits camping within 1,000 feet of schools, parks and day care centers. It was a response to concerns over rising criminal activity near Camp Hope, an encampment that operated for 18 months in the East Central neighborhood and once contained several hundred unhoused residents. The encampment closed in June 2023.

Advocates for the unhoused, who brought the lawsuit, opposed the initiative, noting that it greatly expanded the area where camping is not allowed. However, Spokane voters overwhelmingly passed Proposition 1 in 2023 with nearly 75% of the vote.

The city did not enforce Proposition 1 until the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last summer that states can criminalize homeless encampments regardless of shelter space availability, reversing a previous court decision.

In a written statement, Mayor Lisa Brown wrote that the city’s ordinance prohibiting camping in public areas remains in effect and that the Spokane Police Department is enforcing the law. However, Brown emphasized support for a much more comprehensive approach to addressing the city’s unhoused population, stating that “enforcement alone is not going to solve homelessness.”

Justice C.J. Stephens wrote a dissenting opinion, stating that the majority’s interpretation of what is deemed administrative was too broad and effectively eliminated local initiative power. Stephens felt the proponents of Proposition 1 believed it was a “different policy direction” from the city’s camping policy, and so the initiative was within the scope of what is allowed under the law.

This article was originally published by the Washington State Standard.

Washington lawmakers are on the cusp of eliminating a special education funding cap, which critics said was straining school finances, hurting students and putting the state at risk of a major lawsuit.

On a 97-0 vote on Wednesday, the House amended, then passed, Senate Bill 5263  to put Washington, for the first time, on a course to fully fund special education in its public schools.

It also adjusted two other funding levers in the bill to drive more dollars for special education to the state’s 295 school districts. All told, roughly $870 million more will be sent out over the next two budgets. That sum is a compromise with the Senate, which wanted to spend closer to $2 billion. 

Rep. Gerry Pollet, D-Seattle, who called the cap “unconscionable and maybe unconstitutional,” said its elimination is “a historic achievement.” It commits the state to amply fund the education of every child with a disability, he said.

Ditching the cap “is the very first step to saying we’re going to fully fund special education. This is going to absolutely help our schools,” said Rep. Travis Couture, R-Allyn, who has three children with individualized education plans, or IEPs — plans developed for every public school student who needs special education services.

“It represents something we should all be proud of,” he said. Couture urged his colleagues to guard against any weakening of the legislation in the final stages of budget talks. 

Also Wednesday, the House passed a Senate bill to send additional dollars to districts to cover materials, supplies and operating costs. These costs, which cover non-employee-related expenses tied to a district’s daily operations, have surged in recent years.

The House amended, then passed, Senate Bill 5192 on an 85-12 vote. It would boost the amount of state funding per student for MSOC to $1,614, an increase of $35. An additional $214.94 is provided for each high school student.

Cap would be removed

Special education is where the gap is largest between what districts receive from the state and what they pay for with local dollars. 

In the 2022-23 school year, districts spent $590 million of local levy receipts to make up the difference, according to a performance audit issued in January by the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee.

Washington uses two key mechanisms for determining what a district receives.

First is the cap on the percentage of a school district’s student population that can receive extra dollars for special education services. 

Under current law, the state provides additional funding only for up to 16% of a district’s student population. In other words, if 20% of a district’s population requires special education services, the district cannot get additional money for the remaining 4%.

Second, the state distributes an amount of money for each student enrolled in a school, plus additional dollars for each special education student, under a formula known as the multiplier.

Senate Bill 5263 removes the enrollment cap and increases the multiplier to send more dollars to districts. 

Senate Majority Leader Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, and Senate Minority Leader John Braun, R-Centralia, are the bill’s co-sponsors.

Changes made Wednesday will pump out $870 million to districts over the next four fiscal years, Pollet said.

If House Bill 2049 passes, it will be more, he said. This bill would allow an increase in annual property tax growth from the current 1% cap to the combined rate of population growth plus inflation within a taxing district, not to exceed 3%. This would apply to the state’s property tax, also known as the common schools levy.

The bill would also make other changes that could help districts receive more taxpayer dollars.

fiscal analysis estimates that uncapping the state property tax would bring in an additional $200 million in the next biennium and $618 million in the 2027-29 budget. School districts collectively could raise another $900 million locally over four years. House Bil 2049 is slated to be voted on Friday in the House Finance Committee.

The Washington State Standard originally published a longer version of this article on April 16, 2025.

 

Cascade PBS has received 13 2024 Northwest Regional Emmy® Awards nominations from the Northwest Chapter of the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences. Here are the nominated titles and categories:

Overall Excellence

Cascade PBS

Documentary – Cultural/Historical

ASAHEL: The Curtis Collection, produced by Shannen Ortale, David Quantic, Stephen Hegg, Knute Berger, Bryce Yukio Adolphson, Amanda Snyder, Kalina Torino, Christopher Shreve, David Wulzen, Madeleine Pisaneschi, Greg Cohen. 

Diversity/Equity/Inclusion – Short Form Content

Out & Back: Spreading the Stoke, produced by Shirlyn Wong, Alison Mariella Désir, Sarah E. Hall, Bryce Yukio Adolphson, Madeleine Pisaneschi, David Wulzen. 

Out & Back: Healing Powers of Water, produced by Shirlyn Wong, Alison Mariella Désir, Sarah E. Hall, Bryce Yukio Adolphson, Madeleine Pisaneschi, Andy Motz. 

Arts/Entertainment – Short Form Content

Black Arts Legacies: Visual Arts, produced by Tifa Tomb, Neftali Kirkland, Brangien Davis, Kalina Torino, Arlo Greene and Adam Spiro Brown.

The Nosh with Rachel Belle: Bagel Boom!, produced by Brianna Dorn, Rachel Belle, Bryce Yukio Adolphson, Amanda Snyder, David Wulzen and David Quantic.

Historical/Cultural Short Form Content

Mossback’s Northwest: The Big Boeing Cover-up, produced by Michael McClinton, Knute Berger, Resti Bagcal, Danielle Driehaus, Madeleine Pisaneschi and Tony Arias.

Mossback’s Northwest: Three Problem Bodies, produced by Michael McClinton, Knute Berger, Resti Bagcal, David Quantic, Alegra Figeroid, Madeleine Pisaneschi, Rachel Sandoffsky, Matthew Jorgensen and Tony Arias.

Promotion – Non-News – Campaign

Cascade PBS 70th Anniversary Campaign, produced by Arlo Greene, Greg Cohen, Brodrick Aberly, Madeleine Pisaneschi, Kalina Torino, Matthew Jorgensen, Michael Fox, Resti Bagcal, Don Wilcox, Jeremy Cropf

Photographer – Short Form or Long Form Content

Bryce Yukio Adolphson 

Editor – Short Form Content

David Quantic
Danielle Driehaus
Andy Motz

The recipients will be announced at the Northwest Chapter of the National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences’ Emmy Awards Gala Event on June 7.