Culture

Tourism: French lessons

With Seattle's tourism funding all but gone, France offers inspiration and a few tips.

Tourism: French lessons
Sponsorship

by

Ronald Holden

With Seattle's tourism funding all but gone, France offers inspiration and a few tips.

Economic  development is an engine that runs on many cylinders (manufacturing,  education, construction, housing, health care, transportation, to name a  few). Easily overlooked is travel and tourism — a sprawling, loosely  defined category with a relatively low profile. The hospitality industry  in the U.S. isn't particularly well-organized politically, and its  customers — “tourists” — are often considered a nuisance. It's a huge,  decentralized business (as many people work in the restaurant industry  as in the automobile industry) but, unlike, say, manufacturing, it has  no history of cooperation or mutually beneficial associations, so it has  less influence when governments set economic development budgets  that include tourism promotion.

While Seattle frets at the closing of Washington  State's office of tourism promotion, and the local hospitality industry  volunteers to tax itself to raise a paltry $5 million or so, other  states and other countries are raising bundles of cash to entice  travelers to visit, spend money, stay in hotels, rent cars, eat in  restaurants, and go shopping.

First, a look at France, where tourism  is taken very seriously indeed. La Belle France! No country is more  dependent on international tourism, no country welcomes more visitors  (over 75 million in 2010). And yet, et pourtant . . .

Every  time there's a study, the conclusions are the same: France offers the  most cultural sites of any European country, some of the best food, most  spectacular scenery, and liveliest city life, but its sense of welcome  is, on the whole, insufficient.

The  perceived lack of welcome leads to shorter stays and less revenue from  tourism, so the new Minister of Tourism, Frédéric LeFebvre, has a strong  financial incentive to improve things. (We'll leave for another time  the fact that there's a cabinet-level official in France responsible for  tourism development.)  LeFebvre is going to start with the  international gateway airports (Charles de Gaulle and Orly), the  national railroad SNCF, and the Paris métro to improve, if nothing else,  the quality of signage.

Yes, signs are important, but so is service. Doesn't help if there are long  lines at understaffed immigration, customs, and security checkpoints.  Doesn't help if there are shiny new information booths if waiters in the  cafés are impatient. Doesn't help if cabbies are rude or the sidewalks covered with dog shit.

"Bonjour"  used to be the catchphrase for a nationwide campaign that reminded  every retailer in the country that tourists are visitors to be cossetted  rather than transients to be ignored. Lefebvre's response is to  commission yet another study to elicit the reaction of international  visitors to the quality of French welcome.

As for me, I've seen a sea-change  over the past 25 years — most of it coming in just the last few — in the  number and quality of tourism resources for wine and culinary travel.  Rare indeed is the Gallic "pfft!" and shrug of indifference. Courtesy is  everywhere.

At  Rendez-Vous France, a travel industry trade show held in Bordeaux  earlier this year, the stars were the newcomers — small businesses  (hotels, B&Bs, restaurants, even wineries) with a commitment to hard  work and good service. The 650 French exhibitors welcomed 900 tour  operators from 57 countries (almost two thirds from Europe, only one in  six from the Americas), with some 20,000 20-minute appointments held in  the course of the two-day event. The most sought-after tour operators  were the Brazilians and the Russians, whose clients spend the most money  when they travel. (Used to be the Yanks, decades ago.)

This  was the first Rendez-Vous since UNESCO officially listed "The French  Meal" on its roster of intangible World Heritage. With an hour each day  for lunch, the trade show's catering company managed to serve a  three-course, sit-down lunch to all 2,000 attendees, with white and red  wines, sparkling and still water, plus coffee. And not iceberg lettuce,  either: Salmon gravlax with a mayonnaise dressing; free-range guinea  fowl with carrots, and a molded fruit compote.

But no fromage. They save that for dinner.

The good news is a changing of the guard at the French Tourism Development Agency, Atout France. The new cabinet-level minister, a new director in New York. The not-so-good news is a new logo.

Let's start with the original mistake. "French Government Tourist Agency" was a mouthful, but Maison de la France, as it was known on its home turf, had a certain staid logic. It is, after all, a government-sponsored  membership organization that is open to any business or public entity  involved in travel — a big “house of tourism” (Germany's equivalent was  and is Goethehaus.) But someone decided to update the name and put some  lipstick on the old girl, so they came up with Atout France.

You see, in French, "atout" is your strong suit, your trump card. But in English, a tout is the guy who gives you bad advice at the track. Not what you want from a government agency.

Now on to the logo. The designers originally came up with this: A clever way of promoting the sexy image of France with some subtle typography. You do see that the 'r' and 'a' gently show two chaste breasts, non?

The losing Atout France logo.

With  great fanfare, Atout France asked for votes on four variations of a new  logo. After parties in three cities where guests voted and an online  election, they came up with this desexed version:

Atout France's winning logo.

It could just be a case of tin ear and it could be that the new name and the new logo play reasonably well in Germany, Britain, and Scandinavia — all sources of more visitors than the U.S. But the stumbling block, in this age, isn't language, it's online communication.

The new minister said his number one priority (after signage) was a new  website. Visitors to France certainly deserve better than they're getting now with the dismal and cluttered www.franceguide.com. The creators and managers of the existing site have hundreds of tiny constituencies to appease and are no doubt doing what they think is  required of them: Herding the cats. But bureaucracy is both defensive and well-entrenched. Along with the new logo came word that FranceGuide.com has moved up from the number 106 ranking among  travel sites to number 64. See? They seem to be saying, we're getting  better, we've changed, so you don't have to walk out and start over.

There is, in fact, a slightly better new site in development (currently in beta), rendezvousenfrance.com/fr. Félicitations, I guess, but  it may be too late for cosmetic improvements. And a national tourism  website is daunting for a destination with 75 million visitors a year.

One interesting development: The tourism ministry is no longer tucked under  Culture, but has been moved to Finance. Someone noticed that tourism is  not only France's number two source of employment (number one remains  public sector jobs), but it's the number one source of foreign currency. Culture's a very nice quality-of-life frou-frou, merci, and all that, but money? That's serious business, a job for the big boys.

When the French finance ministers finish dealing with this week's threat to their country's credit rating, they can pay attention once more to securing a nice piece of raw-milk Camembert for those 75 million dinners.

Full disclosure: The author's trip to France earlier this year was sponsored by Atout France  and Air France.

Ronald Holden

By Ronald Holden

Ronald Holden is a regular Crosscut contributor. His new book, published this month, is titled “HOME GROWN Seattle: 101 True Tales of Local Food & Drink." (Belltown Media. $17.95).