Culture

Nanny state: Must Seattle mandate paid sick leave?

The city would do better to promote the idea of paid sick leave for all workers. That would be a lot closer to real leadership.

Advertisement

by

Kent Kammerer

The city would do better to promote the idea of paid sick leave for all workers. That would be a lot closer to real leadership.

Just about everyone has been sick and needed  to stay home from work. Now, we hear the Seattle City Council will consider legislation that would require employers to provide paid  sick leave to their employees.

While actual legislation hasn’t yet been presented, the prospects for  it are creating constituencies on both sides of the issue. Those who  favor such a law are organizing and have already held several  demonstrations. The opposition will come from smaller employers  and restaurateurs; they may mount legal opposition.

The question is both economic and moral at this point. Employers in  small, low-profit-margin businesses claim they can’t afford to pay  people who aren't at work.  On the other side, there are those who are  living on marginal wages now and can’t afford to take time off to see a  doctor or take their children to a medical appointment. They argue that  those without sick leave raise public health issues.  If they have a  transmittable infection, should they be pressured to spread it to  coworkers or, if in the food-services business, to potential customers  and restaurants?

Aside from the moral and financial debate is the more philosophical  discussion of whether a city should create law that tips the scale  toward the nanny state.  The nanny state is a condition where government  assumes the role of the parent and insists morals and lifestyle  be legislated rather than be part of the freedoms the Americas were  promised in the formation of our union.

Our constitution talks about making the pursuit of happiness possible, but not that it be  legislated. The exercise of free will was why we fought the Revolutionary War.

Providing sick leave is not only the right thing to do, but it also makes sense from a public health  point of view. It’s highly likely that employers would discover that,  with paid sick leave, employee loyalty and service would ultimately end  up enhancing the bottom line. But wouldn’t it make more sense for a city  to pursue the same objectives by promoting the concept of sick leave  rather than legislating it?

The city could, if it wanted, demonstrate real leadership by  promoting the idea of paid sick leave. Imagine the positive effects of  having the media covering the arrival of several Seattle City Council members at  a business that didn’t provide paid sick leave to convince management  it was the right thing to do.

Wouldn’t a campaign to promote the advantages of paid sick leave be a better choice? The city Office of Economic Development could  provide cost and productivity data that supports the concept that  paid sick leave creates loyal employees who enhance a business. The city  could establish a PR campaign that promotes and compliments small  businesses that support paid leave. The city might also list businesses that  do not.

What if the city could facilitate the creation of a  cooperative of businesses that currently don’t have sick leave to pool funds in a form of “sick leave insurance” that would help the small business pay for the occasional absent employee going to the  doctor?

The city might even find that there were some perks they  could offer to businesses that created sick leave programs. Maybe  enhanced or less expensive processes for business licensing.  The city might lower  parking rates near their establishments or have their names appear as  favored businesses in Seattle’s Web site. Brochures available to the  tourist industry could point to the businesses that care for their employees.

Chances are that a program of carrots would cost far less than  enforcement at businesses that don’t provide sick leave.

The  precursor to oppressive government is nannyism out of control. Nannyism  and religious radicalism are of the same lineage:   control of the  people.  'Naughty child, do as I say," is the message being sent.

It’s  depressing to think why progressive Seattle elected officials  would even consider the club over the carrot. Real leadership comes  from those who inspire others to do the right thing.

Donation CTA