Culture

Online coupons: Good deal for businesses?

Herewith, a jaundiced view of the Groupon phenomenon. Aren't there better ways for restaurants to build their customer base, and to show their appreciation for those who eat at their place?

Online coupons: Good deal for businesses?
Advertisement

by

Ronald Holden

Herewith, a jaundiced view of the Groupon phenomenon. Aren't there better ways for restaurants to build their customer base, and to show their appreciation for those who eat at their place?

They're known, collectively, as social media coupons.  Groupon, Goldstar, Living Social, Bogopod, Tippr, Gizmodo, Wrazz,  DealPop, and many, many others. They offer a "deal," sometimes half off some  product or service (often meals in a restaurant but it could be hats or  haircuts, spa treatments or medical consultations), sometimes free, if you get  three or four of your friends to sign up with you.

Retailers — small, independent, not particularly skilled at  numbers — jump at the chance to offer their products to a wider audience,  but it's possible many of them are making a big mistake.

As consumers, we like the  notion of a deal, of paying less than "retail," of something for  nothing. Our collective Puritan heritage of thrift has instilled in  contemporary American culture a distaste for profligacy and virtually demands that we seek the lowest price. "I can get it for you wholesale" is part of our psyche as well. Still, in jumping at the chance of  getting something for next-to-nothing, we're only helping the merchants  commit suicide.

We have to assume that retail businesses price their goods and services accurately. That is, the cost of goods (supplies, ingredients,  whatever) plus overhead (labor, occupancy, administration), plus profit.  Where's that 40 percent discount going to come from? Payroll? Rent? Even if you lose a couple of bucks on every transaction, you're not going to  make it up on volume. If a neighbhood restaurant, day spa, or boutique can show me that their 40 percent Groupon discount comes from a budgeted promotional campaign that's part of their  budgeted admin expenses, well, I'll eat my hat. Otherwise, I then have to  assume that the original price was bogus.

The business model we've become used to is a relic of supermarket  wars: the weekly specials, announced in vivid color every Tuesday. Buy  one chicken, get a second chicken free. Hamburger, $1.29 a pound. A free  bag of carrots. Yogurt, 4 for $1. Tuna, 50 cents a can. But we forget  two important points. First, the average supermarket carries 50,000  items on its shelves, and modest cost of discounting the price of a  dozen or so best-sellers (carrots, chicken) is built into the budget.  Second, the rest of the promotions in the weekly mailer (the yogurt, the  tuna) are actually offered by the manufacturers or their distributors,  and don't cost the store a dime. The point is to entice shoppers into  QFC rather than Safeway, the fight is between half-dozen supermarkets,  not 4,000 restaurants. (Similarly, the Cascade yogurt guy's competition,  once you're in the door at QFC, is Tillamook.)

Supermarkets have a captive market, and they know it. Their  promotions aren't designed to help shoppers but to take business away  from the competition. If the supermarket model were transformed to the  world of restaurants, there'd be six restaurant chains in Seattle, plus  maybe a few quirky, neighborhood burger bars, and they'd be the only  places in town where you could buy anything to eat. Each restaurant  would have 1,000 or more seats; there might be a weekly steak special  for $5, but sides, drinks, and dessert would be extra. Your tab, every  time you sat down, would wind up the same, about $75, regardless of  which restaurant you patronized or what you ate.

Oh,  but we just want people to come and try our pizza — burgers — spa  treatment, the retailers say as they offer coupons. To which I reply, recast this. They're  really saying, "We're so sure that our pizza, etc., is so fabulous that  after you pay $10 the first time, you'll come back and pay $20." One  more time: "We're going to train you to think that our $20 pizza is only  worth $10." I call this the Happy Hour fallacy.

One appeal (for the merchant) is the promise of quick payment. The  offer is posted for one day, to be redeemed within a year, but Groupon  usually remits half the net proceeds to the merchant within a week, the  balance within 30 to 60 days. For example, if Groupon sells 1,000  coupons at $25, the merchant's 50 percent share is $12,500, with half  that amount paid almost at once. For many cash-starved restaurants, this  promise of immediate cashflow often seals the deal.

Mark Netsch, who writes PerformanceScope,  an industry newsletter, recalls going to a new wine bar in his  neighborhood, lured by a Groupon discount. The staff was woefully  unprepared. He wrote some advice to merchants, "Groupon and similar  services are indeed a good way to bring in new customers. But before you  Groupon, ask yourself if you and your team are ready."

Unless the  restaurant is guest-ready to deliver on all its marketing promises and  its brand's points of differentiation, Netsch warns, "You will undermine  your mission. Redeeming 3,000 Groupons at 50 percent off is not the  objective, converting those trials to loyal customers is."

Groupon, the hottest and most highly valued of the services, boasts some 20 million bargain-hunting subscribers, and they  pounce quickly. In Chicago, there's a two-year waiting list for  merchants to get into a Groupon promotion. In Portland recently, a  neighborhood coffee shop called Posie's offered a $6 Groupon for a $13  item. A thousand people showed up, swamping the small shop for three  months. In a blog post, the owner said that the volume of sales, coupled  with the steep discount, actualy threatened her business, forcing her  to spend $8,000 of personal savings to pay her employees and the rent.  "The single worst decision I have ever made as a business owner thus  far," she wrote.

Another  misreading of discounts is to confuse lost capacity with lost  opportunity. A cruise ship sails whether or not its 2,000 cabins are  filled. One assumes that an analyst knows exactly how many full-price  cabins are needed to cover operating costs, after which every additional  passenger is "gravy," so you can, indeed, get space on some cruises for  insanely little money. Fancy hotels are in a similar bind. Come 6 p.m.,  they've probably run out of customers for the night, though they may not  want to cheapen their brand by dropping their price too far. Airlines  have similarly inflexible capacity, but they've mastered the art of  flexible pricing; it's called "yield management," and it works. When's  the last time you were on a flight with more than a couple of empty  seats?

But a restaurant, oh my. Fifty seats, let's say, capacity of 100  dinners a night, 700 a week. Average check in Seattle these days,  industry stats tell us, is $30. In theory, then, a modest restaurant  could gross $3,000 a night, a million clams a year. Could, but, for  whatever variety of reasons, doesn't come anywhere close. But Otto the  Owner, he hears the siren song of coupons and makes a pact with the devil. "I'll gladly take an extra 200 clients a week," he thinks, and his fate is sealed. The 200 coupons spend $15 instead of $30 and tip like misers. It costs Otto ten bucks a  plate to feed these mooches, who fill up tables and keep his kitchen  busy, his servers frantic, and annoy the hell out of his regulars.

But  we're not done. Otto's gross is up, true, but he had to add a cook and a  server for the week of the promotion, he had to buy extra food for  those 200 dinners, and he still has to pay the promoter for the coupon  campaign. Otto didn't understand the costs involved; all he saw was  empty tables. He was giving away the store, not realizing that the  cheapskates who showed up with a coupon weren't the kind of customers he  wanted in the first place.

Leigh Fatzinger, founder of Seattle-based Nology Media ("connecting brands with their audiences"), says the problem with online coupons is that they are sent to mass email lists. "If you and your friends  score a $400 dinner for $200, will you really come back at full price,  when the merchant has to make a profit?"

Another online marketing guru, Edward Nevraumont, over at Expedia.com,  sees three issues for restaurants that use social-media coupons. "Big  volume spikes, lots of cannibalization, and brand dilution through  discounting." It shows just how much restaurants need —or think they  need — volume.

Enter a site called Restauranteers.com,  going fully live in the early part of this year, which promises an "opaque" model, in which  the merchant controls the number of promotions that will be available  on any given day. You can see the potential advantage there if you suppose Capitol Hill's Thomas Street Bistro (five  tables) needs to make sure they're filled; the bistro, or another small restaurant, would be nuts to offer the volume of coupons offered by, say, downtown's Cheesecake Factory (400 seats).  

One recent coupon offer did make a certain kind of sense, to me at  least: a limo rental. What better way to convince someone that a limo  ride is really worth the $150 than to offer a trial run at half price?  You don't confuse a limo ride with discount Mexican food. Yes, you  essentially give away the store, but it's such a personalized luxury  that a trial run would seem to stand a strong chance of resulting in repeat business.  

And repeat business is the key. It's what marketers call the  lifetime value of a customer relationship. It's what the limo driver  wants to build; it's what the clothing salesman at Nordstrom wants to build. Nordy runs the occasional sale, sure, but it doesn't send out 50-percent-off-coupons.  (That's Nordstrom Rack, a discount store that feeds off the value of  the company's name.) No, unbelievably, Nordstrom has trained its  customers to pay more, because of the perceived  value of customer service: "They treat me with respect, and if it isn't  right, I can always take it back."

Ask 100 Seattle diners the name of  the city's best restaurant, and I'm pretty sure more than half will tell  you Canlis,  even if they've never been there, because — regardless of price —its  reputation for peerless service. To celebrate its 60th anniversary,  Canlis didn't lower its prices; it did something much more  sophisticated. It staged a treasure hunt that allowed a few people to win a chance to order at the low prices of its 1950 menu.

A  business without a steady customer base is skating on thin ice.  Successful restaurants, retailers, hotels, and airlines have  sophisticated and expensive systems for tracking, retaining, and  rewarding their faithful customers with upgrades and freebies.

One wonders, why throw that investment in an existing customer  relationship out the window by offering discounts to newbies who only  want a cheap dinner? Take that promotional budget you were going to  spend on social media coupons (or, for that  matter, on  Dine Around, or Restaurant Week) and spend it, instead, on  your regular customers. Build a mailing list to track your customers,  treat them like royalty when they visit, add back-of-house staff so the  chef can spend time with the guests, or front-of-house staff so servers  can take the time to cosset the guests. Do more for your existing  customers, and convert them into ambassadors. Think like Nordstrom,  think like Canlis.

Donation CTA
Ronald Holden

By Ronald Holden

Ronald Holden is a regular Crosscut contributor. His new book, published this month, is titled “HOME GROWN Seattle: 101 True Tales of Local Food & Drink." (Belltown Media. $17.95).