Politics

State preservation office presses DOT on its pre-tunnel demolition plans

The two state agencies are at odds over whether to preserve the 619 Western arts building or demolish it before replacing the Alaskan Way Viaduct with a tunnel. Update: The National Trust for Historic Preservation is taking an interest.

State preservation office presses DOT on its pre-tunnel demolition plans
Sponsorship

by

Hugo Kugiya

The two state agencies are at odds over whether to preserve the 619 Western arts building or demolish it before replacing the Alaskan Way Viaduct with a tunnel. Update: The National Trust for Historic Preservation is taking an interest.

This story has been updated with additional material, which is in italics below.

The state agency  in charge of preserving Washington’s historic and cultural resources  has recommended the state not tear down the 619 Western arts building  and consider repairing it instead.

Allyson Brooks,  the State Historic Preservation Officer for the Department of Archeology  and Historic Preservation, said she met with upper-level managers at  the state’s Department of Transportation to discuss “the best path  forward” and “strongly suggested” that they reconsider their recommendation  to demolish 619 Western in preparation for the Alaskan Way Viaduct replacement  project.

“It was  a very good discussion,” Brooks said. “They seemed very open  to looking at this situation in the big-picture scenario…We asked  them to re-think plans based on the reaction of advocacy groups, timeline  issues, and the risk of potential litigation.”

The Department  of Archeology and Historic Preservation is only an advising agency and  does not have the authority to allow or block the demolition of 619  Western, currently used by almost 100 artists as studio and gallery  space and part of the Pioneer Square historic district. That decision  rests with the city of Seattle, which would issue the demolition permit.

The city's process begins with the city-appointed Pioneer Square Preservation Board, which must approve the  construction or demolition of any building in the historic district. That board put off a planned discussion of the issue this week (Jan. 19), saying it needed more information from the DOT.

Federal law  requires the Washington DOT to consider all alternatives before proceeding  with demolition. “I don’t  know what they’re going to do,” Brooks said, “but we did  have a good discussion.”

Ron Mayers,  son of the owners of 619 Western, said the DOT told his family the building,  even if structural bracing was added, would not hold up to the stresses  of the boring necessary to build the tunnel that will replace the viaduct.  The DOT has said that to save the building, it would have to drive new  steel pilings deep beneath the building to shore up its failing wood  pilings.

The DOT and  the building owners are still negotiating terms for compensation should  the building be demolished, Mayers said.

The National  Trust for Historic Preservation has also become involved in the project  as a consulting party, Brooks said. One of its trustees is developer  Kevin Daniels, whose offices are in the Starbucks building in SoDo.  His company was responsible for the redevelopment of Union Station.

The National Trust for Historic Preservation, which typically works with local and regional agencies and governments on issues related to historic preservation, will ask the state DOT to add the Trust as a “consulting partner” on the project as defined by National Historic Preservation Act, said Anthea Hartig, director of the Trust’s western regional office.

“We are keenly looking at the project,” Hartig said. “What we’d like to be is a resource for the DOT and our (historic preservation) partners in Seattle.”

The Trust’s involvement would amount to another, more powerful layer of checks and balances for the construction process and bring to it a considerable amount of legal experience on the federal level. Hartig said her organization is responding in part to concerns voiced by local agencies that the DOT has not made available for scrutiny the calculations it made before recommending that 619 Western be demolished.

“It seemed preemptive at first glance,” Hartig said. “Not to be platitudinal, but demolition is forever.”

The DOT did not immediately comment.

By Hugo Kugiya

A former national correspondent for The Associated Press and Newsday, freelance writer Hugo Kugiya has written about the Northwest for the Puget Sound Business Journal, The Seattle Times, the Los Ange