Politics

Why we should transform Seattle Center from a theater district to a park

The 50th anniversary of the World's Fair is approaching, and there's no better time to acknowledge a mistake of historic levels in urban planning.

Why we should transform Seattle Center from a theater district to a park
Advertisement

by

Anthony B. Robinson

The 50th anniversary of the World's Fair is approaching, and there's no better time to acknowledge a mistake of historic levels in urban planning.

Is it really a great idea to cluster the arts and theater venues in one spot as Seattle has done at Seattle Center?

It works to have a theater district in places like New York and  London, where you have really great and rapid public transit. But in  Seattle, and at the Seattle Center, such a concentration doesn’t work.  It just creates another traffic nightmare and a boring wall of buildings  without context alongside a five-lane highway.

The concentration of theaters at Seattle Center is a wonderful  example of the 1962 Robert Moses-era method of urban planning, a style  that most enlightened cities have tried to forget. Urban planning of  that era was rationalism run amok. All housing here. All industry  there. All retail over there. And everything connected or dis-connected  by massive highways that are impassable to pedestrians.

Jane Jacobs (Death and Life of American Cities) rightly saw that  this so-called urban planning was both boring and dehumanizing. It  didn't build cities, it destroyed them. In the name of efficiency, it  sacrificed all that make cities interesting and exciting, which is mixed  use.

In many parts of Seattle today, renewal does feature this kind of  mixed use. The most exciting neighborhoods have housing, retail,  commercial, public buildings, and parks cheek-by-jowl. One thinks of  Columbia City and Fremont, for example. The least exciting are those,  like the Pill Hill section of Capital Hill, that have been overtaken by  one type of institution, in this case vast, sprawling hospital-medical  centers.

Meanwhile, the “theater district” at Seattle Center is largely  uninviting for pedestrians, remains a traffic nightmare, and doesn’t  really take advantage of lower Queen Anne’s potential in any interesting  or integrated way.

Seattle Center reflects its origins in the era of hyper-rationalist  urban planning, while Seattle itself has made steps toward new urbanism.  Let’s celebrate the 50th anniversary of the 1962 World’s Fair and  Seattle Center by de-constructing the Center, at least a little.

Instead  of cramming in new ventures like Teatro ZinZanni with the others, put  it somewhere else and encourage new theaters to locate in other areas  proximate to light rail. I suspect that part of what’s making it tough  for Intiman and the Seattle Rep is that people have to fight through the  traffic to get there, going both directions, and decide, “Thanks, but  no thanks.”

If people do go, they pay a premium for parking. It all adds  up to limiting theater to the “haves” and cutting out the “have-nots.”

Let Seattle Center morph gradually into an urban park for the many  new housing units nearby. Finance some of this by selling off parts of the Center for new housing, hotels, shops, and restaurants, re-urbanizing the district. At the same time, decentralize theater in Seattle and let  various theaters forge an identity with different neighborhoods.

Donation CTA

By Anthony B. Robinson

Anthony B. Robinson was the Senior Minister of Plymouth Church in downtown Seattle from 1990 to 2004. He was also a member of the Plymouth Housing Group Board. After living for many years in southeast